At Thirty Scott Began to Write (Nov. 17)

At Thirty Scott Began to Write
Are you curious about famous people, their lives, habits, personalities?
Carlyle discusses the intimate life of his illustrious countryman,
and reveals Scott, the man, and Scott, the genius who
entertained Christendom with his stories.
(Scott writes dedication of "Ivanhoe," Nov. 17, 1817.)
Read: Carlyle’s SIR WALTER SCOTT Vol. 25, pp. 410-420



Till towards the age of thirty, Scott’s life has nothing in it decisively
pointing towards Literature, or indeed towards distinction
of any kind; he is wedded, settled, and has gone through all his
preliminary steps, without symptom of renown as yet. It is the life
of every other Edinburgh youth of his station and time. Fortunate
we must name it, in many ways. Parents in easy or wealthy circumstances,
yet unencumbered with the cares and perversions of aristocracy;
nothing eminent in place, in faculty or culture, yet nothing
deficient; all around is methodic regulation, prudence, prosperity,
kindheartedness; an element of warmth and light, of affection, industry,
and burgherly comfort, heightened into elegance; in which
the young heart can wholesomely grow. A vigorous health seems
to have been given by Nature; yet, as if Nature had said withal,
"Let it be a health to express itself by mind, not by body," a lameness
is added in childhood; the brave little boy, instead of romping
and bickering, must learn to think; or at lowest, what is a great
matter, to sit still. N o rackets and trundling-hoops for this young
Walter; but ballads, history-books and a world of legendary stuff,
which his mother and those near him are copiously able to furnish.
Disease, which is but superficial, and issues in outward lameness,
does not cloud the young existence; rather forwards it towards the
expansion it is fitted for. The miserable disease had been one
of the internal nobler parts, marring the general organisation; under
which no Walter Scott could have been forwarded, or with all his
other endowments could have been producible or possible. ‘Nature
gives healthy children much; how much! Wise education is a wise
unfolding of this; often it unfolds itself better of its own accord.’
Add one other circumstance: the place where; namely, Presbyterian
Scotland. The influences of this are felt incessantly, they streamin
at every pore. ‘There is a country accent,’ says La Rochefoucauld,
‘not in speech only, but in thought, conduct, character and manner
of existing, which never forsakes a man.’ Scott, we believe, was all
his days an Episcopalian Dissenter in Scotland; but that makes little

to the matter. Nobody who knows Scotland and Scott can doubt
but Presbyterianism too had a vast share in the forming of him. A
country where the entire people is, or even once has been, laid hold
of, filled to the heart with an infinite religious idea, has ‘made a
step from which it cannot retrograde.’ Thought, conscience, the
sense that man is denizen of a Universe, creature of an Eternity,
has penetrated to the remotest cottage, to the simplest heart. Beautiful
and awful, the feeling of a Heavenly Behest, of Duty god-commanded,
over-canopies all life. There is an inspiration in such a
people: one may say in a more special sense, ‘the inspiration of the
Almighty giveth them understanding.’ Honour to all the brave and
true; everlasting honour to brave old Knox, one of the truest of the
true! That, in the moment while he and his cause, amid civil broils,
in convulsion and confusion, were still but struggling for life, he
sent the schoolmaster forth to all corners, and said, "Let the people
be taught"; this is but one, and indeed an inevitable and comparatively
inconsiderable item in his great message to men. H i s message,
in its true compass, was, "Let men know that they are men; created
by God, responsible to God; who work in any meanest moment of
time what will last throughout eternity." It is verily a great message.
Not ploughing and hammering machines, not patent-digesters
(never so ornamental) to digest the produce of these: no, in no wise;
born slaves neither of their fellow-men, nor of their own appetites;
but men! This great message Knox did deliver, with a man’s voice
and strength; and found a people to believe him.
Of such an achievement, we say, were it to be made once only, the
results are immense. Thought, in such a country, may change its
form, but cannot go out; the country has attained majority; thought,
and a certain spiritual manhood, ready for all work that man can
do, endures there. It may take many forms: the form of hard-fisted
money-getting industry, as in the vulgar Scotchman, in the vulgar
New Englander; but as compact developed force and alertness of
faculty, it is still there; it may utter itself one day as the colossal
Scepticism of a Hume (beneficent this too though painful, wrestling
Titan-like through doubt and inquiry towards new belief); and
again, some better day, it may utter itself as the inspired Melody
of a Burns: in a word, it is there, and continues to manifest itself,

in the Voice and the Work of a Nation of hardy endeavouring considering
men, with whatever that may bear in it, or unfold from it.
The Scotch national character originates in many circumstances;
first of all, in the Saxon stuff there was to work on; but next, and
beyond all else except that, in the Presbyterian Gospel of John Knox.
It seems a good national character; and on some sides not so good.
Let Scott thank John Knox, for he owed him much, little as he
dreamed of debt in that quarter! No Scotchman of his time was
more entirely Scotch than Walter Scott: the good and the not so
good, which all Scotchmen inherit, ran through every fibre of him.
Scott’s childhood, school-days, college-days, are pleasant to read
of, though they differ not from those of others in his place and
time. The memory of him may probably enough last till this record
of them become far more curious than it now is. "So lived an Edinburgh
Writer to the Signet’s son in the end of the eighteenth century,"
may some future Scotch novelist say to himself in the end
of the twenty-first! The following little fragment of infancy is all
we can extract. It is from an Autobiography which he had begun,
which one cannot but regret he did not finish. Scott’s best qualities
never shone out more freely than when he went upon anecdote and
reminiscence. Such a master of narrative and of himself could have
done personal narrative well. Here, if anywhere, his knowledge
was complete, and all his humour and good-humour had free scope:
‘An odd incident is worth recording. It seems, my mother had sent a
maid to take charge of me, at this farm of Sandy-Knowe, that I might
be no inconvenience to the family. But the damsel sent on that important
mission had left her heart behind her, in the keeping of some wild
fellow, it is likely, who had done and said more to her than he was like
to make good. She became extremely desirous to return to Edinburgh;
and, as my mother made a point of her remaining where she was, she
contracted a sort of hatred at poor me, as the cause of her being detained
at Sandy-Knowe. This rose, I suppose, to a sort of delirious affection;
for she confessed to old Alison Wilson, the housekeeper, that she had
carried me up to the craigs under a strong temptation of the Devil to
cut my throat with her scissors, and bury me in the moss. Alison
instantly took possession of my person, and took care that her confidant
should not be subject to any farther temptation, at least so far as I was
concerned. She was dismissed of course, and I have heard afterwards
became a lunatic.

‘It is here, at Sandy-Knowe, in the residence of my paternal grandfather,
already mentioned, that I have the first consciousness of existence;
and I recollect distinctly that my situation and appearance were a
litde whimsical. Among the odd remedies recurred to, to aid my lameness,
some one had recommended that so often as a sheep was killed for
the use of the family, I should be stripped, and swathed-up in the skin
warm as it was flayed from the carcass of the animal. In this Tartar-like
habiliment I well remember lying upon the floor of the little parlour in
the farmhouse, while my grandfather, a venerable old man with white
hair, used every excitement to make me try to crawl. I also distinctly
remember the late Sir George M’Dougal of Mackerstown, father of the
present Sir Henry Hay M’Dougal, joining in the attempt. He was, God
knows how, a relation of ours; and I still recollect him, in his oldfashioned
military habit (he had been Colonel of the Greys), with a
small cocked-hat deeply laced, an embroidered scarlet waistcoat, and a
light-coloured coat, with milk-white locks tied in a military fashion,
kneeling on the ground before me, and dragging his watch along the
carpet to induce me to follow it. The benevolent old soldier, and the
infant wrapped in his sheepskin, would have afforded an odd group to
uninterested spectators. This must have happened about my third year
(1774), for Sir George M’Dougal and my grandfather both died shordy
after that period.’2
We will glance next into the ‘Liddesdale Raids.’ Scott has grownup
to be a brisk-hearted jovial young man and Advocate: in vacationtime
he makes excursions to the Highlands, to the Border Cheviots
and Northumberland; rides free and far, on his stout galloway,
through bog and brake, over the dim moory Debatable Land,—over
Flodden and other fields and places, where, though he yet knew it
not, his work lay. No land, however dim and moory, but either has
had or will have its poet, and so become not unknown in song.
Liddesdale, which was once as prosaic as most dales, having now
attained illustration, let us glance thitherward: Liddesdale too is
on this ancient Earth of ours, under this eternal Sky; and gives and
takes, in the most incalculable manner, with the Universe at large!
Scott’s experiences there are rather of the rustic Arcadian sort; the
element of whisky not wanting. We should premise that here and
there a feature has, perhaps, been aggravated for effect’s sake:
‘During seven successive years,’ writes Mr. Lockhart (for the Autobiography
has long since left us), ‘Scott made a raid, as he called it, into
2 Vol. i. pp. 15-17.

Liddesdale with Mr. Shortreed, sheriff-substitute of Roxburgh, for his
guide; exploring every rivulet to its source, and every ruined peel from
foundation to batdement. At this time no wheeled carriage had ever been
seen in the district;—the first, indeed, was a gig, driven by Scott himself
for a part of his way, when on the last of these seven excursions. There
was no inn nor publichouse of any kind in the whole valley; the travellers
passed from the shepherd’s hut to the minister’s manse, and again from
the cheerful hospitality of the manse to the rough and jolly welcome of
the homestead; gathering, wherever they went, songs and tunes, and
occasionally more tangible relics of antiquity, even such a "rowth of auld
knicknackets" as Burns ascribes to Captain Grose. To these rambles
Scott owed much of the materials of his Minstrelsy of the Scottish Border;
and not less of that intimate acquaintance with the living manners of
these unsophisticated regions, which constitutes the chief charm of one
of the most charming of his prose works. But how soon he had any
definite object before him in his researches seems very doubtful. "He was
makiri himsell a’ the time," said Mr. Shortreed; "but he didna ken
maybe what he was about till years had passed: at first he thought o’
little, I daresay, but the queerness and the fun."
‘ "In those days," says the Memorandum before me, "advocates were
not so plenty—at least about Liddesdale;" and the worthy Sheriffsubstitute
goes on to describe the sort of bustle, not unmixed with alarm,
produced at the first farmhouse they visited (Willie Elliot’s at Millburnholm),
when the honest man was informed of the quality of one of his
guests. When they dismounted, accordingly, he received Mr. Scott with
great ceremony, and insisted upon himself leading his horse to the
stable. Shortreed accompanied Willie, however; and the latter, after
taking a deliberate peep at Scott, "out-by the edge of the door-cheek,"
whispered, "Weel, Robin, I say, de’il hae me if I’s be a bit feared for him
now; he’s just a chield like ourselves, I think." Half-a-dozen dogs of all
degrees had already gathered round "the advocate," and his way of returning
their compliments had set Willie Elliot at once at his ease.
‘According to Mr. Shortreed, this good man of Millburnholm was the
great original of Dandie Dinmont.’ * * * ‘They dined at Millburnholm;
and, after having lingered over Willie Elliot’s punchbowl, until, in Mr.
Shortreed’s phrase, they were "half-glowrin’," mounted their steeds
again, and proceeded to Dr. Elliot’s at Cleughhead, where ("for," says
my Memorandum, "folk werena very nice in those days") the two
travellers slept in one and the same bed,—as, indeed, seems to have been
the case with them throughout most of their excursions in this primitive
district. Dr. Elliot (a clergyman) had already a large MS. collection of
the ballads Scott was in quest of.’ * * * ‘Next morning they seem to
have ridden a long way for the express purpose of visiting one "auld
Thomas o’ Tuzzilehope," another Elliot, I suppose, who was celebrated

for his skill on the Border pipe, and in particular for being in possession
of the real lilt2 of Dic\ o the Cowe. Before starting, that is, at six
o’clock, the ballad-hunters had, "just to lay the stomach, a devilled duck
or twae and some London porter." Auld Thomas found them, nevertheless,
well disposed for "breakfast" on their arrival at Tuzzilehope; and
this being over, he delighted them with one of the most hideous and
unearthly of all specimens of "riding music," and, moreover, with considerable
libations of whisky-punch, manufactured in a certain wooden
vessel, resembling a very small milkpail, which he called "Wisdom," because
it "made" only a few spoonfuls of spirits,—though he had the art
of replenishing it so adroitly, that it had been celebrated for fifty years
as more fatal to sobriety than any bowl in the parish. Having done due
honour to "Wisdom," they again mounted, and proceeded over moss
and moor to some other equally hospitable master of the pipe. "Ah me,"
says Shortreed, "sic an endless fund o’ humour and drollery as he then
had wi’ him! Never ten yards but we were either laughing or roaring
and singing. Wherever we stopped, how brawlie he suited himsell to
everybody! He aye did as the lave did; never made himsell the great
man, or took ony airs in the company. I’ve seen him in a’ moods in these
jaunts, grave and gay, daft and serious, sober and drunk—(this, however,
even in our wildest rambles, was rare)—but, drunk or sober, he was aye
the gentleman. He lookit excessively heavy and stupid when he was jou,
but he was never out o’ gude humour." ‘
These are questionable doings, questionably narrated; but what
shall we say of the following, wherein the element of whisky plays
an extremely prominent part? We will say that it is questionable,
and not exemplary, whisky mounting clearly beyond its level; that
indeed charity hopes and conjectures here may be some aggravating
of features for effect’s sake!
‘On reaching, one evening, some Charlieshope or other (I forget the
name) among those wildernesses, they found a kindly recepdon, as
usual; but, to their agreeable surprise after some days of hard living, a
measured and orderly hospitality as respected liquor. Soon after supper,
at which a bottle of elderberry-wine alone had been produced, a young
student of divinity, who happened to be in the house, was called upon
to take the "big ha’ Bible," in the good old fashion of Burns’s "Saturday
Night"; and some progress had been already made in the service, when
the good-man of the farm, whose "tendency," as Mr. Mitchell says, "was
soporific," scandalised his wife and the dominie by starting suddenly
from his knees, and, rubbing his eyes, with a stentorian exclamation of
"By , here’s the keg at last!" and in tumbled, as he spoke the word,
3 Loud tune: German, lallen.

a couple of sturdy herdsmen, whom, on hearing a day before of the
advocate’s approaching visit, he had despatched to a certain smuggler’s
haunt, at some considerable distance, in quest of a supply of run brandy
from the Solway Frith. The pious "exercise" of the household was hopelessly
interrupted. With a thousand apologies for his hitherto shabby
entertainment, this jolly Elliot, or Armstrong, had the welcome keg
mounted on the table without a moment’s delay; and gentle and simple,
not forgetting the dominie, continued carousing about it until daylight
streamed-in upon the party. Sir Walter Scott seldom failed, when I saw
him in company with his Liddesdale companion, to mimic with infinite
humour the sudden outburst of his old host on hearing the clatter of
horses’ feet, which he knew to indicate the arrival of the keg—the consternation
of the dame—and the rueful despair with which the young
clergyman closed the book.’4
From which Liddesdale raids, which we here, like the young
clergyman, close not without a certain rueful despair, let the reader
draw what nourishment he can. They evince satisfactorily, though
in a rude manner, that in those days young advocates, and Scott
like the rest of them, were alive and alert,—whisky sometimes preponderating.
But let us now fancy that the jovial young Advocate
has pleaded his first cause; has served in yeomanry drills; been
wedded, been promoted Sheriff, without romance in either case; dabbling
a little the while, under guidance of Monk Lewis, in translations
from the German, in translation of Goethe’s Gotz with the
Iron Hand;—and we have arrived at the threshold of the Minstrelsy
of the Scottish Border, and the opening of a new century.
Hitherto, therefore, there has been made out, by Nature and Circumstance
working together, nothing unusually remarkable, yet
still something very valuable; a stout effectual man of thirty, full
of broad sagacity and good humour, with faculties in him fit for
any burden of business, hospitality and duty, legal or civic:—with
what other faculties in him no one could yet say. As indeed, who,
after lifelong inspection, can say what is in any man? The uttered
part of a man’s life, let us always repeat, bears to the unuttered unconscious
part a small unknown proportion; he himself never knows
it, much less do others. Give him room, give him impulse; he
reaches down to the Infinite with that so straitly-imprisoned soul
4 Vol. i. pp. 195-199.

of his; and can do miracles if need be! It is one of the comfortablest
truths that great men abound, though in the unknown state. Nay,
as above hinted, our greatest, being also by nature our quietest, are
perhaps those that remain unknown! Philosopher Fichte took comfort
in this belief, when from all pulpits and editorial desks, and
publications periodical and stationary, he could hear nothing but
the infinite chattering and twittering of commonplace become ambitious;
and in the infinite stir of motion nowhither, and of din which
should have been silence, all seemed churned into one tempestuous
yeasty froth, and the stern Fichte almost desired ‘taxes on knowledge’
to allay it a little;—he comforted himself, we say, by the unshaken
belief that Thought did still exist in Germany; that thinking
men, each in his own corner, were verily doing their work, though
in a silent manner.5
Walter Scott, as a latent Walter, had never amused all men for
a score of years in the course of centuries and eternities, or gained
and lost several hundred thousand pounds sterling by Literature;
but he might have been a happy and by no means a useless,—nay,
who knows at bottom whether not a still usefuler Walter! However,
that was not his fortune. The Genius of rather a singular age,
—an age at once destitute of faith and terrified at scepticism, with
little knowledge of its whereabout, with many sorrows to bear or
front, and on the whole with a life to lead in these new circumstances,—
had said to himself: What man shall be the temporary
comforter, or were it but the spiritual comfit-maker, of this my
poor singular age, to solace its dead tedium and manifold sorrows
a little? So had the Genius said, looking over all the world, What
man? and found him walking the dusty Outer Parliament-house
of Edinburgh, with his advocate-gown on his back; and exclaimed,
That is he!
The Minstrelsy of the Scottish Border proved to be a well from
which flowed one of the broadest rivers. Metrical Romances (which
in due time pass into Prose Romances); the old life of men resuscitated
for us: it is a mighty word! Not as dead tradition, but as a
palpable presence, the past stood before us. There they were, the
‘Fichte, Uber das Wesen des Gelehrten.

rugged old fighting men; in their doughty simplicity and strength,
with their heartiness, their healthiness, their stout self-help, in their
iron basnets, leather jerkins, jack-boots, in their quaintness of manner
and costume; there as they looked and lived: it was like a newdiscovered
continent in Literature; for the new century, a bright
El Dorado,—or else some fat beatific land of Cockaigne, and Paradise
of Donothings. To the opening nineteenth century, in its languor
and paralysis, nothing could have been welcomer. Most unexpected,
most refreshing and exhilarating; behold our new El Dorado;
our fat beatific Lubberland, where one can enjoy and do
nothing! It was the time for such a new Literature; and this Walter
Scott was the man for it. The Lays, the Marmions, the Ladys and
Lords of Lake and Isles, followed in quick succession, with everwidening
profit and praise. How many thousands of guineas were
paid-down for each new Lay; how many thousands of copies (fifty
and more sometimes) were printed off, then and subsequently;
what complimenting, reviewing, renown and apotheosis there was:
all is recorded in these Seven Volumes, which will be valuable in
literary statistics. It is a. history, brilliant, remarkable; the outlines
of which are known to all. The reader shall recall it, or conceive it.
No blaze in his fancy is likely to mount higher than the reality did.
At this middle period of his life, therefore, Scott, enriched with
copyrights, with new official incomes and promotions, rich in money,
rich in repute, presents himself as a man in the full career of success.
‘Health, wealth, and wit to guide them’ (as his vernacular
Proverb says), all these three are his. The field is open for him,
and victory there; his own faculty, his own self, unshackled, victoriously
unfolds itself,—the highest blessedness that can befall a
man. Wide circle of friends, personal loving admirers; warmth of
domestic joys, vouchsafed to all that can true-heartedly nestle down
among them; light of radiance and renown given only to a few:
who would not call Scott happy? But the happiest circumstance of
all is, as we said above, that Scott had in himself a right healthy
soul, rendering him little dependent on outward circumstances.
Things showed themselves to him not in distortion or borrowed
light or gloom, but as they were. Endeavour lay in him and endurance,
in due measure; and clear vision of what was to be endeav-

oured after. Were one to preach a Sermon on Health, as really were
worth doing, Scott ought to be the text. Theories are demonstrably
true in the way of logic; and then in the way of practice they prove
true or else not true: but here is the grand experiment, Do they
turn-out well? What boots it that a man’s creed is the wisest, that
his system of principles is the superfinest, if, when set to work, the
life of him does nothing but jar, and fret itself into holes? They are
untrue in that, were it in nothing else, these principles of his; openly
convicted of untruth;—fit only, shall we say, to be rejected as counterfeits,
and flung to the dogs? We say not that; but we do say,
that ill-health, of body or of mind, is defeat, is battle (in a good or
in a bad cause) with bad success; that health alone is victory. Let
all men, if they can manage it, contrive to be healthy! He who in
what cause soever sinks into pain and disease, let him take thought
of it; let him know well that it is not good he has arrived at yet, but
surely evil,—may, or may not be, on the way towards good.
Scott’s healthiness showed itself decisively in all things, and nowhere
more decisively than in this: the way in which he took his
fame; the estimate he from the first formed of fame. Money will
buy money’s worth; but the thing men call fame, what is it? A
gaudy emblazonry, not good for much,—except, indeed, as it too
may turn to money. To Scott it was a profitable pleasing superfluity,
no necessary of life. Not necessary, now or ever! Seemingly
without much effort, but taught by Nature, and the instinct which
instructs the sound heart what is good for it and what is not, he
felt that he could always do without this same emblazonry of reputation;
that he ought to put no trust in it; but be ready at any time
to see it pass away from him, and to hold on his way as before. It
is incalculable, as we conjecture, what evil he escaped in this manner;
what perversions, irritations, mean agonies without a name,
he lived wholly apart from, knew nothing of. Happily before fame
arrived, he had reached the mature age at which all this was easier
to him. What a strange Nemesis lurks in the felicities of men! In
thy mouth it shall be sweet as honey, in thy belly it shall be bitter
as gall! Some weakly-organised individual, we will say at the age
of five-and-twenty, whose main or whole talent rests on some
prurient susceptivity, and nothing under it but shallowness and

vacuum, is clutched hold of by the general imagination, is whirled
aloft to the giddy height; and taught to believe the divine-seeming
message that he is a great man: such individual seems the luckiest
of men: and, alas, is he not the unluckiest? Swallow not the Circedraught,
O weakly-organised individual; it is fell poison; it will dry
up the fountains of thy whole existence, and all will grow withered
and parched; thou shalt be wretched under the sunl
Is there, for example, a sadder book than that Life of Byron by
Moore? To omit mere prurient susceptivities that rest on vaccum,
look at poor Byron, who really had much substance in him. Sitting
there in his self-exile, with a proud heart striving to persuade itself
that it despises the entire created Universe; and far off, in foggy
Babylon, let any pitifulest whipster draw pen on him, your proud
Byron writhes in torture,—as if the pitiful whipster were a magician,
or his pen a galvanic wire struck into the Byron’s spinal
marrow! Lamentable, despicable,—one had rather be a kitten and
cry mew! O son of Adam, great or little, according as thou art
lovable, those thou livest with will love thee. Those thou livest not
with, is it of moment that they have the alphabetic letters of thy name
engraved on their memory, with some signpost likeness of thee (as
like as I to Hercules) appended to them? It is not of moment; in
sober truth, not of any moment at all! And yet, behold, there is no
soul now whom thou canst love freely,—from one soul only art thou
always sure of reverence enough; in presence of no soul is it rightly
well with thee! How is thy world become desert; and thou, for the
sake of a little babblement of tongues, art poor, bankrupt, insolvent
not in purse, but in heart and mind! ‘The Golden Calf of self-love,’
says Jean Paul, ‘has grown into a burning Phalaris’ Bull, to consume
its owner and worshipper.’ Ambition, the desire of shining and
outshining, was the beginning of Sin in this world. The man of
letters who founds upon his fame, does he not thereby alone declare
himself a follower of Lucifer (named Satan, the Enemy), and
member of the Satanic school?

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: